Stephen Crook

934 citations
12 papers · 386 indexed · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Crook

10 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers

Stephen Crook
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Sociology and Political Science 199
  • Communication 27
  • Philosophy 35
  • Gender Studies 29
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 33
Replace Jackson Lears with:
Jackson Lears United States
John Ralston Saul South Africa
Jorge Larraín Chile
Sighard Neckel Germany
Stuart Μ. Blumin United States
Stephen Eric Bronner Netherlands
Carl Boggs United States
Maurice Isserman United States
George Rehin United Kingdom
Frederick C. Luebke United States
Stephen Crook relative to Jackson Lears United States Jackson Lears's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jackson Lears · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Crook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Crook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Crook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Crook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Crook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Crook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Crook. The network helps show where Stephen Crook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Crook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Crook Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Crook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 20122
2 199830
3 199838
4 199534
5
Adorno: The Stars Down to Earth and Other Essays on the Irrational in Culture
199477
6 19937
7
Postmodernization: Change in Advanced Society
1992180
8
Modernist Radicalism and its Aftermath: Foundationalism and Anti-Foundationalism in Radical Social Theory
19918
9 19906
10 19900
11 19893
12 19871

About Stephen Crook

Stephen Crook is a scholar working on Communication, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 12 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (2 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper), Climate Change Communication and Perception (1 paper), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (1 paper), Media, Gender, and Advertising (1 paper) and Media Influence and Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (199 citations), Communication (27 citations), Philosophy (35 citations), Gender Studies (29 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (33 citations). Stephen Crook has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jan Pakulski, Malcolm Waters, Theodor W. Adorno, Bruce Tranter, Colin Ratledge, Mark R. Smith, Ross Poole, Jorge Arditi, Anthony Woodiwiss and Jean Baudrillard. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Enzyme and Microbial Technology, Sociology, Australian Journal of Political Science and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026