Michael Cherington

2.5k citations
77 papers · 1.9k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Cherington

74 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Michael Cherington
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Neurology 815
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 322
  • Emergency Medicine 127
  • Epidemiology 428
  • Ophthalmology 83
Replace Thomas H. Mader with:
Thomas H. Mader United States
Arthur I. Kobrine United States
Christoph Meißner Germany
Mehmet Turgut Türkiye
Barrie J. Hurwitz United States
J.M. Minderhoud Netherlands
David Ley Sweden
Ronald M. Perkin United States
Wolf‐Dirk Niesen Germany
Frank Joachim Erbguth Germany
Michael Cherington relative to Thomas H. Mader United States Thomas H. Mader's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Thomas H. Mader · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Cherington

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Cherington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Cherington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Cherington more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Cherington

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Cherington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Cherington. The network helps show where Michael Cherington may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Cherington, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Cherington Line = papers co-authored together Michael Cherington links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998205
2 2004106
3 197496
4 200369
5 199366
6 199562
7 198661
8 196858
9 197054
10 197752
11
Electrophysiologic methods as an aid in diagnosis of botulism: a review.
198252
12 196846
13 199244
14
Neurologic complications of lightning injuries.
199542
15 196641
16 197639
17 200138
18 197636
19 199236
20 196835

About Michael Cherington

Michael Cherington is a scholar working on Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Surgery and Rheumatology, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (19 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (16 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (14 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (12 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (8 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (6 papers), Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders (5 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (815 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (322 citations), Emergency Medicine (127 citations), Epidemiology (428 citations) and Ophthalmology (83 citations). Michael Cherington has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Philip R. Yarnell, Margaret M. Maier Hoehn, D. W. Ryan, Russell D. Snyder, Jeff Hodges, John C. Stears, E. Philip Krider, Ronald L. Holle, Daniel W. Breed and Raúl E. López. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, The Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, Seminars in Neurology and Neurorehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact