Neurorehabilitation

2.5k papers and 41.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Neurorehabilitation in the last decades have received a total of 41.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Neurorehabilitation usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (734 papers), Epidemiology (729 papers) and Rehabilitation (671 papers) specifically the topics of Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (661 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (572 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (528 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neurorehabilitation are Sung Ho Jang, Olive Kobusingye, Gopalkrishna Gururaj, Prasanthi Puvanachandra, Colleen A. Wunderlich, Adnan A. Hyder, Joseph T. Giacino, Stefan Hesse, Juan Carlos Arango‐Lasprilla and Joan Toglia.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neurorehabilitation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neurorehabilitation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neurorehabilitation.

Countries where authors publish in Neurorehabilitation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neurorehabilitation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neurorehabilitation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurorehabilitation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025