Michael Bütter
Impact in
-
- Social Media and Politics
-
- Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Media Influence and Politics
- Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
Papers in
-
- Misinformation and Its Impacts 11
- Crime, Deviance, and Social Control 2
-
- Cinema and Media Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Peter Knight (3 shared papers)P. L. Knight (1 shared paper)Hans‐Bernd Schäfer (1 shared paper)Eva Barlösius (1 shared paper)Patrick Keller (1 shared paper)Alexander Bogner (1 shared paper)Carsten Reinhardt (1 shared paper)Michael Zürn (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Diogenes (1 paper)Canadian Review of American Studies (1 paper)Minerva (1 paper)Social research (1 paper)Kyklos (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomAustria
In The Last Decade
Michael Bütter
16 papers receiving 102 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Communication 33
- Sociology and Political Science 95
- Literature and Literary Theory 14
- Philosophy 14
- Health 9
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Bütter
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Bütter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Bütter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Bütter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Bütter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Bütter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Bütter. The network helps show where Michael Bütter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Michael Bütter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 36 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 19 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 6 | The History of Conspiracy Theory Research: A Review and Commentary | 2018 | 6 |
| 7 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 11 | Conspiracy Theories – Conspiracy Narratives | 2021 | 1 |
| 12 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 0 |
About Michael Bütter
Michael Bütter is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory and Cultural Studies, having authored 20 papers that have together received 116 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Misinformation and Its Impacts (11 papers), German History and Society (2 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (2 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (2 papers), Computational Physics and Python Applications (1 paper) and International Science and Diplomacy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (33 citations), Sociology and Political Science (95 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (14 citations), Philosophy (14 citations) and Health (9 citations). Michael Bütter has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Peter Knight, P. L. Knight, Hans‐Bernd Schäfer, Eva Barlösius, Patrick Keller, Alexander Bogner, Carsten Reinhardt, Michael Zürn, Hannes Bergthaller and Torsten Wilholt. Their work appears in journals such as Diogenes, Canadian Review of American Studies, Minerva, Social research and Kyklos.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.