Hans‐Bernd Schäfer
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Law top 1%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Strategy and Management
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Claus OttHein KötzJochen BigusVincy FonThomas EgerRam SinghRobert D. CooterMichael Bütter
- Topics
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (23 papers)European and International Contract Law (13 papers)Legal principles and applications (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Hans‐Bernd Schäfer
39 papers receiving 192 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Economics and Econometrics 156
- Law 87
- Political Science and International Relations 33
- Strategy and Management 28
- Sociology and Political Science 24
Countries citing papers authored by Hans‐Bernd Schäfer
This map shows the geographic impact of Hans‐Bernd Schäfer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans‐Bernd Schäfer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans‐Bernd Schäfer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hans‐Bernd Schäfer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans‐Bernd Schäfer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans‐Bernd Schäfer. The network helps show where Hans‐Bernd Schäfer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hans‐Bernd Schäfer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hans‐Bernd Schäfer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hans‐Bernd Schäfer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hans‐Bernd Schäfer. Hans‐Bernd Schäfer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Brexit Poker – czyli o tym, kto ma lepsze karty w negocjacjach ustąpieniowych (Art. 50 TUE) (Brexit Poker – Who Has a Better Hand in the Withdrawal Negotiations (Article 50 TEU)) | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | Are Inventories a Buffer Against Weak Legal Systems | 3 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Judex oeconomicus : 12 höchstrichterliche Entscheidungen kommentiert aus ökonomischer Sicht | 1 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Hans‐Bernd Schäfer
Hans‐Bernd Schäfer is a scholar working on Law, Economics and Econometrics and Pharmacy, having authored 51 papers that have together received 230 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (23 papers), European and International Contract Law (13 papers) and Legal principles and applications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (87 citations), Economics and Econometrics (156 citations) and Pharmacy (17 citations). Hans‐Bernd Schäfer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Claus Ott, Hein Kötz, Jochen Bigus, Vincy Fon, Thomas Eger, Ram Singh, Robert D. Cooter, Michael Bütter, Giuseppe Dari‐Mattiacci and H. Becker. Their work appears in journals such as European Economic Review, Kyklos and Andrologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.