Michaël Bubenheim
- Reproductive Medicine top 2%
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment 5
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
-
- Respiratory Support and Mechanisms 6
- Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment 6
- Surgery top 5%
- Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions 4
- Genetics top 5%
-
- Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment 6
-
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis 5
-
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments 4
-
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 4
Michaël Bubenheim
70 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Reproductive Medicine 259
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 218
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 765
- Surgery 1.0k
- Genetics 216
Countries citing papers authored by Michaël Bubenheim
This map shows the geographic impact of Michaël Bubenheim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michaël Bubenheim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michaël Bubenheim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michaël Bubenheim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michaël Bubenheim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michaël Bubenheim. The network helps show where Michaël Bubenheim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michaël Bubenheim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 41 | |
| 11 | ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Febrile Neutropenia and Haematological Malignancies. | 2015 | 11 |
| 12 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 90 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 35 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 38 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 97 |
About Michaël Bubenheim
Michaël Bubenheim is a scholar working on Hepatology, Reproductive Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 72 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (6 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (5 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (5 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (4 papers), Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (4 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (259 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (218 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (765 citations). Michaël Bubenheim has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Felix Blake, Emre F. Yekebas, Jakob R. Izbicki, Claudia Lange, Norbert Stute, Axel R. Zander, Dean Bogoevski, Jussuf T. Kaifi, Emmanuel Huet and Christian R. Habermann. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgical Oncology, Human Reproduction, Annals of Intensive Care, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Autoimmunity Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.