Michael Becker‐Peth

440 citations
10 papers · 288 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Becker‐Peth

8 papers receiving 280 citations

Peers

Michael Becker‐Peth
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Management Information Systems 227
  • General Decision Sciences 27
  • Marketing 98
  • Management Science and Operations Research 118
  • Strategy and Management 121
Replace João L. Assunção with:
João L. Assunção Portugal
Chuan He United States
Anyan Qi United States
Anirvan Banerji United States
Mümin Kurtuluş United States
Michael Krapp Germany
Jon A. Higbie United States
Peter Kischka Germany
Richard Lai United States
Juan Camilo Serpa Canada
Michael Becker‐Peth relative to João L. Assunção Portugal João L. Assunção's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
João L. Assunção · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Becker‐Peth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Becker‐Peth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Becker‐Peth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Becker‐Peth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Becker‐Peth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Becker‐Peth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Becker‐Peth. The network helps show where Michael Becker‐Peth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Michael Becker‐Peth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Becker‐Peth Line = papers co-authored together Michael Becker‐Peth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2013151
2 201567
3 201724
4 201024
5 201910
6 20175
7 20174
8 20213
9 20240
10
Behavioral Supply Chain Contracting: Decision Biases in Behavioral Operations Management
20190

About Michael Becker‐Peth

Michael Becker‐Peth is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Marketing, Management Science and Operations Research, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 288 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Supply Chain and Inventory Management (7 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (5 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (5 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (2 papers), Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization (1 paper), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper) and Quality and Supply Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (227 citations), General Decision Sciences (27 citations), Marketing (98 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (118 citations) and Strategy and Management (121 citations). Michael Becker‐Peth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ulrich W. Thonemann, Elena Katok, Kai Hoberg, Margarita Protopappa‐Sieke, Bernhard Roth, Stefan Minner and Andreas Fügener. Their work appears in journals such as Production and Operations Management, Acta Paediatrica, Management Science, European Journal of Operational Research and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact