Anirvan Banerji
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Topics
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (8 papers)Global Financial Crisis and Policies (7 papers)Economic Theory and Policy (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Management Information SystemsGeneral Economics, Econometrics and FinanceStrategy and Management
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Anirvan Banerji
11 papers receiving 212 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Management Information Systems 117
- Strategy and Management 82
- Economics and Econometrics 69
- Management Science and Operations Research 63
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 56
Countries citing papers authored by Anirvan Banerji
This map shows the geographic impact of Anirvan Banerji's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anirvan Banerji with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anirvan Banerji more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anirvan Banerji
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anirvan Banerji. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anirvan Banerji. The network helps show where Anirvan Banerji may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anirvan Banerji
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anirvan Banerji. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anirvan Banerji based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anirvan Banerji. Anirvan Banerji is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 146 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | An Indicator Approach to Business and Growth Rate Cycles: The Case of India | 10 |
| 14 | Dating the Indian Business Cycle: Is Output All That Counts? | 1 |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 7 |
About Anirvan Banerji
Anirvan Banerji is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 244 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (8 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (7 papers) and Economic Theory and Policy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (117 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (56 citations) and Strategy and Management (82 citations). Anirvan Banerji has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Joel H. Steckel, Сунил Гупта, Pami Dua, Allan P. Layton, Stephen M. Miller and Geoffrey H. Moore. Their work appears in journals such as Management Science, International Journal of Forecasting and Applied Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.