Michael Anesko
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 10%
- History top 10%
- Co-authors
- John W. CrowleyLyall H. PowersLeón EdelThomas StrychaczElizabeth AmmonsKenneth W. WarrenTom QuirkDonald Pizer
- Topics
- Literature: history, themes, analysis (6 papers)American and British Literature Analysis (5 papers)Race, History, and American Society (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Literature and Literary TheoryVisual Arts and Performing ArtsHistory and Philosophy of Science
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael Anesko
16 papers receiving 52 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Literature and Literary Theory 124
- Sociology and Political Science 34
- Philosophy 19
- Cultural Studies 16
- History 14
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Anesko
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Anesko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Anesko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Anesko more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Anesko
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Anesko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Anesko. The network helps show where Michael Anesko may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Anesko
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Anesko. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Anesko based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Anesko. Michael Anesko is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | Monopolizing the Master: Henry James and the Politics of Modern Literary Scholarship | 6 |
| 8 | The French Face of Nathaniel Hawthorne: Monsieur de l'Aubépine and His Second Empire Critics | 0 |
| 9 | Contemporary American Literature, 1945-Present | 1 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Michael Anesko
Michael Anesko is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Philosophy of Science and History, having authored 27 papers that have together received 175 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature: history, themes, analysis (6 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (5 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (124 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (11 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (9 citations). Michael Anesko has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John W. Crowley, Lyall H. Powers, León Edel, Thomas Strychacz, Elizabeth Ammons, Kenneth W. Warren, Tom Quirk, Donald Pizer, Louis J. Budd and Richard Lehan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, American Literature and The New England Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.