Mette Grønkjær
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Erik Elgaard SørensenTine CurtisCharlotte DelmarCharlotte de CrespignyCharlotte Brun ThorupJohn HansenBirthe DinesenJan Jesper Andreasen
- Topics
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers)Nursing education and management (9 papers)Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Journal of PediatricsJournal of Medical Internet Research
In The Last Decade
Mette Grønkjær
72 papers receiving 869 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- General Health Professions 364
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 147
- Epidemiology 122
- Clinical Psychology 121
- Physiology 107
Countries citing papers authored by Mette Grønkjær
This map shows the geographic impact of Mette Grønkjær's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mette Grønkjær with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mette Grønkjær more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mette Grønkjær
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mette Grønkjær. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mette Grønkjær. The network helps show where Mette Grønkjær may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mette Grønkjær
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mette Grønkjær. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mette Grønkjær based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mette Grønkjær. Mette Grønkjær is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 57 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 38 | |
| 19 | 65 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Mette Grønkjær
Mette Grønkjær is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and General Health Professions, having authored 79 papers that have together received 892 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers), Nursing education and management (9 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (81 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (33 citations) and General Health Professions (364 citations). Mette Grønkjær has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Australia and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Erik Elgaard Sørensen, Tine Curtis, Charlotte Delmar, Charlotte de Crespigny, Charlotte Brun Thorup, John Hansen, Birthe Dinesen, Jan Jesper Andreasen, Tiffany Conroy and Gitte Nielsen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of Pediatrics and Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.