Annelise Norlyk
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Surgery
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Ingegerd HarderBente MartinsenAnita HaahrPia DreyerElisabeth O.C. HallHanne KronborgRegner BirkelundJanne Brammer Damsgaard
- Topics
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers)Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (9 papers)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Advanced NursingBMJ Open
- Partner nations
- DenmarkNorwayUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Annelise Norlyk
58 papers receiving 883 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- General Health Professions 396
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 252
- Surgery 151
- Clinical Psychology 120
- Sociology and Political Science 107
Countries citing papers authored by Annelise Norlyk
This map shows the geographic impact of Annelise Norlyk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annelise Norlyk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annelise Norlyk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annelise Norlyk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annelise Norlyk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annelise Norlyk. The network helps show where Annelise Norlyk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annelise Norlyk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annelise Norlyk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annelise Norlyk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annelise Norlyk. Annelise Norlyk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 148 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | Acknowledging the back patient: A systematic review based on thematic synthesis | 1 |
| 18 | Sygeplejefaglig refleksion er både fortid og fremtid | 1 |
| 19 | Tre Kvalitative tilgange. Fænomenologi, hermeneutik og Grounded Theory | 0 |
| 20 | Fænomenologi som forskningsmetode | 1 |
About Annelise Norlyk
Annelise Norlyk is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 63 papers that have together received 919 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (9 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (35 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (81 citations) and General Health Professions (396 citations). Annelise Norlyk has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Norway and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ingegerd Harder, Bente Martinsen, Anita Haahr, Pia Dreyer, Elisabeth O.C. Hall, Hanne Kronborg, Regner Birkelund, Janne Brammer Damsgaard, Lene Bastrup Jørgensen and Marianne Lisby. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Advanced Nursing and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.