Mervin Glasser
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Topics
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers)Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers)Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mervin Glasser
12 papers receiving 331 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Clinical Psychology 325
- Health 131
- Sociology and Political Science 118
- General Health Professions 62
- Gender Studies 57
Countries citing papers authored by Mervin Glasser
This map shows the geographic impact of Mervin Glasser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mervin Glasser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mervin Glasser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mervin Glasser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mervin Glasser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mervin Glasser. The network helps show where Mervin Glasser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mervin Glasser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mervin Glasser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mervin Glasser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mervin Glasser. Mervin Glasser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 144 | |
| 2 | On violence. A preliminary communication. | 36 |
| 3 | Problems in the psychoanalysis of certain narcissistic disorders | 9 |
| 4 | Primary care physicians' recognition of and attitudes toward domestic violence. | 72 |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | Problems in the psychoanalysis of certain narcissistic disorders. | 34 |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | Identification and its vicissitudes as observed in the perversions. | 48 |
| 10 | The role of the superego in exhibitionism. | 5 |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | Attempted suicide and self-mutilation in adolescence: some observations from a psychoanalytic research project. | 32 |
About Mervin Glasser
Mervin Glasser is a scholar working on General Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Museology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (131 citations), Clinical Psychology (325 citations) and Gender Studies (57 citations). Mervin Glasser has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen A. Reid, I. Leitch, I. Kolvin, David G. Campbell, Simone Farrelly, Moses Laufer and Martin Wohl. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.