Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy

724 papers and 3.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 724 papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy usually cover Clinical Psychology (573 papers), Philosophy (140 papers) and Social Psychology (86 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (439 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (135 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (95 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy are Richard Lucas, Valerie Sinason, Peter Fonagy, Andrzej Werbart, Alessandra Lemma, Heather Wood, Brian Martindale, John F. Steiner, Ian Parker and Jessica Yakeley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy.

Countries where authors publish in Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025