Merle L. Diamond
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.1%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.2%
- Physiology top 1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Sensory Systems top 1%
- Co-authors
- Richard B. LiptonMichael L. ReedWalter F. StewartSeymour DiamondFrederick G. FreitagMarcelo E. BigalRoger CadyGeorge Papadopoulos
- Topics
- Migraine and Headache Studies (49 papers)Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (23 papers)Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesDenmarkGermany
In The Last Decade
Merle L. Diamond
50 papers receiving 5.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Psychiatry and Mental health 5.1k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 3.1k
- Physiology 1.9k
- Surgery 561
- Sensory Systems 400
Countries citing papers authored by Merle L. Diamond
This map shows the geographic impact of Merle L. Diamond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Merle L. Diamond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Merle L. Diamond more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Merle L. Diamond
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Merle L. Diamond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Merle L. Diamond. The network helps show where Merle L. Diamond may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Merle L. Diamond
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Merle L. Diamond. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Merle L. Diamond based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Merle L. Diamond. Merle L. Diamond is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 72 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 50 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 61 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 35 | |
| 10 | 84 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 52 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | Migraine Diagnosis and Treatment: Results From the American Migraine Study IIbreakdown → | 573 |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Merle L. Diamond
Merle L. Diamond is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Sensory Systems, having authored 52 papers that have together received 5.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (49 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (23 papers) and Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (5.1k citations), Medical Terminology (49 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (3.1k citations). Merle L. Diamond has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Richard B. Lipton, Michael L. Reed, Walter F. Stewart, Seymour Diamond, Frederick G. Freitag, Marcelo E. Bigal, Roger Cady, George Papadopoulos, Anthony W. Fox and Egilius L.H. Spierings. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Neurology and Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.