Merle Goldman
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Anthropology top 10%
- Co-authors
- John Κ. FairbankLucian W. PyeDenis Fred SimonMichael GassterMichel OksenbergElizabeth EconomyRoderick MacFarquharMaurice Meisner
- Topics
- Chinese history and philosophy (27 papers)China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (13 papers)Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSingaporeSlovenia
In The Last Decade
Merle Goldman
50 papers receiving 565 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Sociology and Political Science 482
- Political Science and International Relations 370
- Cultural Studies 79
- Economics and Econometrics 57
- Anthropology 38
Countries citing papers authored by Merle Goldman
This map shows the geographic impact of Merle Goldman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Merle Goldman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Merle Goldman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Merle Goldman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Merle Goldman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Merle Goldman. The network helps show where Merle Goldman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Merle Goldman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Merle Goldman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Merle Goldman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Merle Goldman. Merle Goldman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Citizens' Struggles in China's Post-Mao Era | 1 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Political rights in post-Mao China | 11 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 58 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 59 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 39 |
About Merle Goldman
Merle Goldman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Cultural Studies, having authored 59 papers that have together received 788 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (27 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (13 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (370 citations), Sociology and Political Science (482 citations) and Development (37 citations). Merle Goldman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include John Κ. Fairbank, Lucian W. Pye, Denis Fred Simon, Michael Gasster, Michel Oksenberg, Elizabeth Economy, Roderick MacFarquhar, Maurice Meisner, Timothy Cheek and Elizabeth J. Perry. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, Modern Language Journal and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.