Meriam Caboral‐Stevens
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Clinical Psychology
- Oncology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Julie M. LongElizabeth AndrewsMichelle GeeBrigitte S. CypressRosalinda V. IgnacioLorraine S. EvangelistaTsu‐Yin WuJohn Sonnega
- Topics
- Technology Use by Older Adults (3 papers)Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (2 papers)COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Meriam Caboral‐Stevens
26 papers receiving 358 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- General Health Professions 147
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 132
- Clinical Psychology 73
- Oncology 54
- Sociology and Political Science 48
Countries citing papers authored by Meriam Caboral‐Stevens
This map shows the geographic impact of Meriam Caboral‐Stevens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meriam Caboral‐Stevens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meriam Caboral‐Stevens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Meriam Caboral‐Stevens
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meriam Caboral‐Stevens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meriam Caboral‐Stevens. The network helps show where Meriam Caboral‐Stevens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meriam Caboral‐Stevens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meriam Caboral‐Stevens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meriam Caboral‐Stevens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meriam Caboral‐Stevens. Meriam Caboral‐Stevens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 157 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 71 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Meriam Caboral‐Stevens
Meriam Caboral‐Stevens is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Medical Laboratory Technology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Use by Older Adults (3 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (2 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (27 citations), Leadership and Management (12 citations) and General Health Professions (147 citations). Meriam Caboral‐Stevens has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Julie M. Long, Elizabeth Andrews, Michelle Gee, Brigitte S. Cypress, Rosalinda V. Ignacio, Lorraine S. Evangelista, Tsu‐Yin Wu, John Sonnega and Xining Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Research, Nurse Education Today and Advances in Nursing Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.