Meredith L. McGill
- Literature and Literary Theory top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History top 5%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jonathan ElmerRobert C. DavisPatrick O’DonnellJacqueline GoldsbyMichael MoonAndrew ParkerRonald J. ZborayP. L. Gould
- Topics
- Digital Humanities and Scholarship (4 papers)Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers)American and British Literature Analysis (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Meredith L. McGill
13 papers receiving 103 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Literature and Literary Theory 163
- Sociology and Political Science 43
- History 30
- Anthropology 29
- Cultural Studies 25
Countries citing papers authored by Meredith L. McGill
This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith L. McGill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith L. McGill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith L. McGill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith L. McGill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith L. McGill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith L. McGill. The network helps show where Meredith L. McGill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meredith L. McGill
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meredith L. McGill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meredith L. McGill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meredith L. McGill. Meredith L. McGill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | The duplicity of the pen | 1 |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Literary history, book history, and media studies | 1 |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | Taking liberties with the author: selected essays from the English Institute | 0 |
| 12 | Frances Ellen Watkins Harper and the circuits of abolitionist poetry | 0 |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 82 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 30 |
About Meredith L. McGill
Meredith L. McGill is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies and Marketing, having authored 23 papers that have together received 250 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Humanities and Scholarship (4 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers) and American and British Literature Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (163 citations), Music (18 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (14 citations). Meredith L. McGill has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Elmer, Robert C. Davis, Patrick O’Donnell, Jacqueline Goldsby, Michael Moon, Andrew Parker, Ronald J. Zboray, P. L. Gould, Robert S. Levine and Tim Armstrong. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, MLN and American Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.