Melvin W. Reder

37 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

The Methodology of Positive...197420261991200820091974250500750

Peers

Melvin W. Reder
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.2k
  • Sociology and Political Science 625
  • Social Psychology 355
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 310
  • Public Administration 216
Replace Joop Hartog with:
Joop Hartog Netherlands
Giacomo Corneo Germany
Tibor Scitovsky United States
Kenneth F. Scheve United States
Stefanie Stantcheva United States
Ricardo Pérez-Truglia United States
Richard Nadeau Canada
Pierre Cahuc France
W. Lee Hansen United States
Robert Dur Netherlands
Melvin W. Reder relative to Joop Hartog Netherlands Joop Hartog's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Joop Hartog · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melvin W. Reder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melvin W. Reder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melvin W. Reder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melvin W. Reder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melvin W. Reder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melvin W. Reder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melvin W. Reder. The network helps show where Melvin W. Reder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Melvin W. Reder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Melvin W. Reder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Melvin W. Reder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Melvin W. Reder. Melvin W. Reder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
The Methodology of Positive Economicsbreakdown →
779
2 7
3 24
4 8
5
Perspectives from Economics and Psychology: Editor's Comments
4
6 26
7 33
8
Chicago Economics: Permanence and Change
220
9 125
10 17
11 0
12
Nations and households in economic growth : essays in honor of Moses Abramovitzbreakdown →
543
13
Some Problems in the Measurement of Productivity in the Medical Care Industry
3
14 53
15 11
16 22
17 9
18 4
19 2
20 14

About Melvin W. Reder

Melvin W. Reder is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and General Decision Sciences, having authored 40 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (8 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (5 papers) and Global trade and economics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (189 citations), Public Administration (216 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (1.2k citations). Melvin W. Reder has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Moses Abramovitz, Paul A. David, George R. Neumann, Robin M. Hogarth, Thomas Mayer, Michel De Vroey, David Teira, Jack Vromen, Oliver E. Williamson and Uskali Mäki. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Journal of Political Economy and The Journal of Economic Perspectives.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026