Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Methodology of Positive Economics
2009779 citationsUskali Mäki, Milton Friedman et al.Cambridge University Press eBooksprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of David Teira's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Teira with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Teira more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Teira. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Teira. The network helps show where David Teira may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Teira
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Teira.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Teira based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Teira. David Teira is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Alejandro, Cristián, et al.. (2015). Disease-mongering through clinical trials. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 51. 11–18.15 indexed citations
7.
Teira, David. (2013). On the impartiality of early British clinical trials. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 44(3). 412–418.7 indexed citations
Teira, David. (2009). La razón estrangulada. La crisis de la ciencia en la sociedad contemporánea, de Carlos Elías. Teorema: Revista internacional de filosofía. 28(3). 203–206.1 indexed citations
13.
Mäki, Uskali, Milton Friedman, J. Daniel Hammond, et al.. (2009). The Methodology of Positive Economics. Cambridge University Press eBooks.779 indexed citations breakdown →
Teira, David. (2002). Terroristas racionales. RESEÑA de: Sanchez-Cuenca, Ignacio. ETA contra el Estado. Las estrategias del terrorismo. Barcelona: Tusquets, 2001.7 indexed citations
18.
Teira, David, et al.. (2002). Frank Knight y los positivistas. UNED repository. 107–141.1 indexed citations
19.
Teira, David. (2000). Economía, Estadística y Política en la metodología de Milton Friedman. 233–248.1 indexed citations
20.
Teira, David. (1998). Conocimiento e imaginario social. Empiria Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales. 241–243.49 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.