Melissa A. Smith

894 total citations · 1 hit paper
18 papers, 583 citations indexed

About

Melissa A. Smith is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Melissa A. Smith has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 583 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Social Psychology, 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Melissa A. Smith's work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (7 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (2 papers) and Cognitive Functions and Memory (2 papers). Melissa A. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (7 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (2 papers) and Cognitive Functions and Memory (2 papers). Melissa A. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Melissa A. Smith's co-authors include Raja Parasuraman, Ewart J. de Visser, Patrick E. McKnight, Ryan McKendrick, Frank Krüeger, Samuel S. Monfort, Eva Wiese, Edith L. Bavin, Letitia Naigles and F.W. Krueger and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Dermatology, Developmental Science and Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied.

In The Last Decade

Melissa A. Smith

15 papers receiving 543 citations

Hit Papers

Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Melissa A. Smith United States 8 315 210 119 93 85 18 583
Brett Stoll United States 9 235 0.7× 211 1.0× 72 0.6× 129 1.4× 42 0.5× 10 453
Victoria Groom United States 10 456 1.4× 193 0.9× 100 0.8× 166 1.8× 121 1.4× 17 687
Elisabetta Zibetti France 11 255 0.8× 137 0.7× 53 0.4× 50 0.5× 65 0.8× 25 424
Marlena R. Fraune United States 15 477 1.5× 264 1.3× 119 1.0× 165 1.8× 166 2.0× 47 666
Joo-Wha Hong United States 10 108 0.3× 121 0.6× 126 1.1× 98 1.1× 166 2.0× 15 453
Daniel Ullrich Germany 8 167 0.5× 95 0.5× 44 0.4× 66 0.7× 49 0.6× 29 402
Eileen Roesler Germany 13 423 1.3× 301 1.4× 113 0.9× 62 0.7× 79 0.9× 40 619
Céline Mougenot United Kingdom 12 155 0.5× 92 0.4× 78 0.7× 35 0.4× 70 0.8× 51 480
Sarah Sebo United States 12 406 1.3× 231 1.1× 151 1.3× 83 0.9× 85 1.0× 25 583
Muneeb Ahmad United Kingdom 12 336 1.1× 232 1.1× 27 0.2× 23 0.2× 68 0.8× 59 532

Countries citing papers authored by Melissa A. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melissa A. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melissa A. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melissa A. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melissa A. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melissa A. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melissa A. Smith. The network helps show where Melissa A. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Melissa A. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Melissa A. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Melissa A. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Melissa A. Smith. Melissa A. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Smith, Melissa A., et al.. (2024). Giving Voice through Reparative Storytelling: Correcting Racist Epistemic Injustices in LIS. The Library Quarterly. 94(4). 441–457.
2.
Mittu, Ranjeev, et al.. (2021). Human-Centered Alphabet Soup: Approaches to Systems Development from Related Disciplines. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 65(1). 1167–1170. 4 indexed citations
3.
Wiese, Eva, et al.. (2018). Implicit mind perception alters vigilance performance because of cognitive conflict processing.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 25(1). 25–40. 15 indexed citations
4.
Smith, Melissa A., et al.. (2017). Mind Perception in Humanoid Agents has Negative Effects on Cognitive Processing. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 61(1). 1585–1589. 12 indexed citations
5.
Smith, Melissa A., et al.. (2017). Are Human Factors Students Prepared for Careers in User Experience Research? A Survey of Predicted and Actual Skill Utilization. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 61(1). 1101–1105. 9 indexed citations
6.
Visser, Ewart J. de, Samuel S. Monfort, Ryan McKendrick, et al.. (2016). Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 22(3). 331–349. 386 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Smith, Melissa A., et al.. (2016). Trust in Automated Agents is Modulated by the Combined Influence of Agent and Task Type. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 60(1). 206–210. 13 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Melissa A., et al.. (2015). Improving voter experience through user testing and iterative design. Journal of Usability Studies archive. 10(4). 116–128. 1 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Melissa A., et al.. (2015). Look, Don’t Touch. Ergonomics in Design The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications. 23(2). 10–15.
10.
Smith, Melissa A., et al.. (2014). A Comparison of Prototyping on Paper (POP) Software and Traditional Paper Prototyping for Developing Mobile Products with Optimal User Experience. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 58(1). 1849–1853. 2 indexed citations
11.
Squire, Peter, et al.. (2013). Quick-Eye: Examination of Human Performance Characteristics Using Eye Tracking and Manual-Based Control Systems for Monitoring Multiple Displays. 1 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Melissa A., et al.. (2013). Using Iterative Design and Testing Towards the Development of SRTS®. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 57(1). 2076–2080. 3 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Melissa A., et al.. (2012). The Effects of Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Design Environment on Design Fixation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 56(1). 1977–1981. 4 indexed citations
14.
Visser, Ewart J. de, et al.. (2012). The World is not Enough: Trust in Cognitive Agents. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 56(1). 263–267. 69 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Melissa A.. (2011). Everyday talk informs toddlers’ novel verb generalizations. First Language. 31(4). 404–424. 1 indexed citations
16.
Naigles, Letitia, Edith L. Bavin, & Melissa A. Smith. (2005). Toddlers recognize verbs in novel situations and sentences. Developmental Science. 8(5). 424–431. 33 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Melissa A.. (2000). The Effects of Display Highlighting and Event History on Operator Decision Making in a National Missile Defense System Application.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 2 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Melissa A., et al.. (1963). PSOKIASIS AND THE NAILS.. British Journal of Dermatology. 75(11). 415–418. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026