Brett Stoll

644 total citations
10 papers, 453 citations indexed

About

Brett Stoll is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Brett Stoll has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 453 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Brett Stoll's work include Social Robot Interaction and HRI (4 papers), AI in Service Interactions (3 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers). Brett Stoll is often cited by papers focused on Social Robot Interaction and HRI (4 papers), AI in Service Interactions (3 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers). Brett Stoll collaborates with scholars based in United States. Brett Stoll's co-authors include Chad Edwards, Malte Jung, Autumn Edwards, Xialing Lin, Sarah Sebo, Brian Scassellati, Dominic DiFranzo, Shruti Sannon, Susan R. Fussell and Natalya N. Bazarova and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction and Communication Studies.

In The Last Decade

Brett Stoll

10 papers receiving 434 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Brett Stoll United States	9	235	211	129	72	65	10	453
Daniel Ullrich Germany	8	167 0.7×	95 0.5×	66 0.5×	44 0.6×	148 2.3×	29	402
Victoria Groom United States	10	456 1.9×	193 0.9×	166 1.3×	100 1.4×	168 2.6×	17	687
Joo-Wha Hong United States	10	108 0.5×	121 0.6×	98 0.8×	126 1.8×	46 0.7×	15	453
Jae-Gil Lee South Korea	9	180 0.8×	99 0.5×	72 0.6×	49 0.7×	38 0.6×	17	348
Leigh Clark United Kingdom	14	292 1.2×	491 2.3×	57 0.4×	49 0.7×	176 2.7×	38	713
Stephan Schlögl Austria	10	140 0.6×	280 1.3×	73 0.6×	28 0.4×	91 1.4×	38	470
Magnus Lundeberg Sweden	8	126 0.5×	126 0.6×	127 1.0×	17 0.2×	58 0.9×	13	391
Huma Shah United Kingdom	11	118 0.5×	156 0.7×	53 0.4×	105 1.5×	24 0.4×	42	407
Rinat B. Rosenberg‐Kima Israel	10	185 0.8×	158 0.7×	68 0.5×	67 0.9×	64 1.0×	26	534
Marlena R. Fraune United States	15	477 2.0×	264 1.3×	165 1.3×	119 1.7×	72 1.1×	47	666

Countries citing papers authored by Brett Stoll

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brett Stoll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brett Stoll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brett Stoll more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brett Stoll

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brett Stoll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brett Stoll. The network helps show where Brett Stoll may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brett Stoll

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brett Stoll. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brett Stoll based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brett Stoll. Brett Stoll is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Sebo, Sarah, Brett Stoll, Brian Scassellati, & Malte Jung. (2020). Robots in Groups and Teams. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 4(CSCW2). 1–36. 92 indexed citations

2.

Sannon, Shruti, Brett Stoll, Dominic DiFranzo, Malte Jung, & Natalya N. Bazarova. (2020). “I just shared your responses”. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 4(GROUP). 1–18. 18 indexed citations

3.

Jung, Malte, et al.. (2020). Robot-Assisted Tower Construction—A Method to Study the Impact of a Robot’s Allocation Behavior on Interpersonal Dynamics and Collaboration in Groups. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction. 10(1). 1–23. 40 indexed citations

4.

Stoll, Brett, Malte Jung, & Susan R. Fussell. (2018). Keeping it Light. 247–248. 8 indexed citations

5.

Sannon, Shruti, Brett Stoll, Dominic DiFranzo, Malte Jung, & Natalya N. Bazarova. (2018). How Personification and Interactivity Influence Stress-Related Disclosures to Conversational Agents. 285–288. 23 indexed citations

6.

Edwards, Chad, et al.. (2018). Evaluations of an artificial intelligence instructor's voice: Social Identity Theory in human-robot interactions. Computers in Human Behavior. 90. 357–362. 186 indexed citations

7.

Stoll, Brett, et al.. (2018). Wait, Can You Move the Robot?. 14–22. 30 indexed citations

8.

Stoll, Brett, Chad Edwards, & Autumn Edwards. (2016). “Why Aren’t You a Sassy Little Thing”: The Effects of Robot-Enacted Guilt Trips on Credibility and Consensus in a Negotiation. Communication Studies. 67(5). 530–547. 23 indexed citations

9.

Stoll, Brett. (2015). The Effects of Humorous Facebook Posts on Messenger Credibility and Social Attractiveness. ScholarWorks - WMU (Western Michigan University). 7(2). 3. 3 indexed citations

10.

Edwards, Chad, et al.. (2015). Social Presence on LinkedIn: Perceived Credibility and Interpersonal Attractiveness Based on User Profile Picture. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies. 5(4). 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact