Brett Stoll
Impact in
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Papers in
-
- Social Robot Interaction and HRI 4
- Communication in Education and Healthcare 2
- Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion 1
-
- AI in Service Interactions 3
- Co-authors
- Chad Edwards (3 shared papers)Malte Jung (6 shared papers)Autumn Edwards (2 shared papers)Xialing Lin (1 shared paper)Sarah Sebo (1 shared paper)Brian Scassellati (1 shared paper)Dominic DiFranzo (3 shared papers)Natalya N. Bazarova (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (2 papers)Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies (1 paper)Communication Studies (1 paper)Computers in Human Behavior (1 paper)ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Brett Stoll
10 papers receiving 463 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Social Psychology 240
- Human-Computer Interaction 65
- Safety Research 73
- Health Informatics 9
- Artificial Intelligence 212
Countries citing papers authored by Brett Stoll
This map shows the geographic impact of Brett Stoll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brett Stoll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brett Stoll more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brett Stoll
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brett Stoll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brett Stoll. The network helps show where Brett Stoll may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Brett Stoll, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 194 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 101 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 10 | The Effects of Humorous Facebook Posts on Messenger Credibility and Social Attractiveness | 2015 | 3 |
About Brett Stoll
Brett Stoll is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory and Safety Research, having authored 10 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Robot Interaction and HRI (4 papers), AI in Service Interactions (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (2 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (2 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (1 paper) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (240 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (65 citations), Safety Research (73 citations), Health Informatics (9 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (212 citations). Brett Stoll has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Chad Edwards, Malte Jung, Autumn Edwards, Xialing Lin, Sarah Sebo, Brian Scassellati, Dominic DiFranzo, Natalya N. Bazarova, Shruti Sannon and Susan R. Fussell. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, Communication Studies, Computers in Human Behavior and ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.