Melanie Ring

22 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

Melanie Ring
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Developmental Neuroscience 68
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 220
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 122
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 62
  • Genetics 90
Replace Hannah Kirk with:
Hannah Kirk Australia
Holly Zajac Gastgeb United States
Lucie Bouvet France
Dean D’Souza United Kingdom
Angela E. John United States
Luigi Marotta Italy
Samantha Bellucci Italy
Saadia Ahmad Canada
María Sotillo Spain
Susan Peppé United Kingdom
Melanie Ring relative to Hannah Kirk Australia Hannah Kirk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hannah Kirk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melanie Ring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melanie Ring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanie Ring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanie Ring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melanie Ring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanie Ring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanie Ring. The network helps show where Melanie Ring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Melanie Ring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melanie Ring Line = papers co-authored together Melanie Ring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202056
2 200547
3 201537
4
Lexical and morphological skills in English-speaking children with Williams Syndrome
200327
5 201526
6 201819
7 201813
8 201712
9
Morphosyntax in down’s syndrome: is the extended optional infinitive hypothesis an option?
201111
10 202011
11 20169
12 20179
13 20178
14 20237
15 20245
16 20234
17 20174
18 20244
19 20194
20 20251

About Melanie Ring

Melanie Ring is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (18 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (9 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (4 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (3 papers), Language Development and Disorders (3 papers), Williams Syndrome Research (3 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (68 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (220 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (122 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (62 citations) and Genetics (90 citations). Melanie Ring has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sebastian Gaigg, Dermot Bowler, Harald Clahsen, Christine M. Temple, Bérengère Guillery‐Girard, Anaïs R. Briant, Fabian Guenolé, Jean‐Jacques Parienti, Priscille Gérardin and Francis Eustache. Their work appears in journals such as Autism Research, BMC Psychiatry, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Autism and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact