This map shows the geographic impact of Meik Poschen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meik Poschen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meik Poschen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meik Poschen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meik Poschen. The network helps show where Meik Poschen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meik Poschen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meik Poschen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meik Poschen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Meik Poschen. Meik Poschen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Turner, Martin, et al.. (2012). Secure data sharing across portals: experiences from OneVRE. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. 371(1983). 20120069–20120069.1 indexed citations
Randall, Dave, Rob Procter, Yuwei Lin, et al.. (2011). Distributed ontology building as practical work. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 69(4). 220–233.13 indexed citations
6.
Procter, Rob, Robin Williams, James Stewart, et al.. (2010). Adoption and Use of Web 2.0 in Scholarly Communications. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Goff, Mhorag, et al.. (2010). The implications of disciplinary practices for emerging modes of data sharing: a case study of Biomedical researchers. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).2 indexed citations
9.
Procter, Richard, et al.. (2010). If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use web 2.0. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).60 indexed citations
10.
Procter, Rob, Robin Williams, James Stewart, et al.. (2010). Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. 368(1926). 4039–4056.124 indexed citations
11.
Poschen, Meik, et al.. (2010). User-Driven Development of a Pilot Data Management Infrastructure for Biomedical Researchers. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).4 indexed citations
12.
Collins, Simon, et al.. (2010). Towards a generic research data management infrastructure. Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick).2 indexed citations
13.
Randall, Dave, et al.. (2009). What about Sea Urchins? Collaborative Ontology Building among Bio-Informaticians.1 indexed citations
Procter, Rob, Meik Poschen, Yuwei Lin, Carole Goble, & David De Roure. (2009). Issues for the sharing and re-use of scientific workflows. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).2 indexed citations
16.
Lin, Yuwei, Meik Poschen, Peter Halfpenny, & Rob Procter. (2008). Research 2.0: Social Networking Sites for Scientists. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).1 indexed citations
17.
Poschen, Meik, Mark Turner, Terry Hanley, et al.. (2008). 4th International Conference on e-Social Science.3 indexed citations
18.
Lin, Yuwei, Meik Poschen, Alex Voß, et al.. (2008). Agile Management: Strategies for Developing a Social Networking Site for Scientists. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).5 indexed citations
19.
Poschen, Meik, Martin Turner, Terry Hanley, et al.. (2008). User-centered development of a Virtual Research Environment to support collaborative research events. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 1–10.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.