This map shows the geographic impact of Alex Voß's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alex Voß with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alex Voß more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alex Voß. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alex Voß. The network helps show where Alex Voß may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alex Voß
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alex Voß.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alex Voß based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alex Voß. Alex Voß is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hutchings, Stephen, et al.. (2015). 'Staging the Sochi Winter Olympics 2014 on Russia Today and BBC World News: From soft power to geopolitical crisis'. St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository). 12(1). 630–658.15 indexed citations
Procter, Rob, Robin Williams, James Stewart, et al.. (2010). Adoption and Use of Web 2.0 in Scholarly Communications. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Halfpenny, Peter, Rob Procter, & Alex Voß. (2010). Sustainability of Research Data Management Services. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).1 indexed citations
Voß, Alex, et al.. (2009). Adoption of e-infrastructure services : inhibitors enablers and opportunities.3 indexed citations
11.
Halfpenny, Peter, Rob Procter, Yuwei Lin, & Alex Voß. (2008). The UK e-Social Science Research Programme: a progress report. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).
12.
Lin, Yuwei, Rob Procter, Peter Halfpenny, Alex Voß, & Kathleen Baird. (2007). An action-oriented ethnography of interdisciplinary social scientific work. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).7 indexed citations
13.
Voß, Alex, Richard Procter, Mike Fraser, et al.. (2007). e-Infrastructure development and community engagement. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).9 indexed citations
14.
Hartswood, Mark, Marina Jirotka, Rob Procter, et al.. (2005). Working IT out in e-Science: experiences of requirements capture in a HealthGrid project.. PubMed. 112. 198–209.14 indexed citations
Hartswood, Mark, et al.. (2003). Working out IT in Medical Practice: IT systems design and development as co-production. Methods of Information in Medicine. 42(4).
17.
Hartswood, Mark, Rob Procter, Roger Slack, et al.. (2002). Co-realisation: towards a principled synthesis of ethnomethodology and participatory design. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 14(2). 9–30.84 indexed citations
18.
Shapiro, Dan, Alex Voß, Mark Hartswood, et al.. (2002). Promises, premises and risks : sharing responsibilities, working up trust and sustaining commitment in participatory design projects. Participatory Design Conference. 183–192.17 indexed citations
19.
Voß, Alex, Rob Procter, Roger Slack, et al.. (2001). Production management and ordinary action : an investigation of situated, resourceful action in production planning and control. Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick).2 indexed citations
20.
Voß, Alex, Rob Procter, & Robin Williams. (2000). Innovation in use: Interleaving day-to-day operation and systems development. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 192–201.16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.