Meghan Sacks
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Crime Patterns and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Crime Patterns and Interventions 9
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 7
- Sex work and related issues 1
-
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 4
- Co-authors
- Alissa R. Ackerman (8 shared papers)Vincenzo A. Sainato (1 shared paper)David F. Greenberg (1 shared paper)Rich Furman (1 shared paper)Roger Koppl (1 shared paper)Lila Kazemian (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Justice Quarterly (1 paper)American Journal of Criminal Justice (1 paper)Criminal Justice Studies (1 paper)Punishment & Society (1 paper)Journal of Criminal Justice (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Meghan Sacks
10 papers receiving 256 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Clinical Psychology 120
- Sociology and Political Science 226
- Gender Studies 33
- Law 25
- Health 18
Countries citing papers authored by Meghan Sacks
This map shows the geographic impact of Meghan Sacks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meghan Sacks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meghan Sacks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Meghan Sacks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meghan Sacks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meghan Sacks. The network helps show where Meghan Sacks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Meghan Sacks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 33 | |
| 5 | The New Penology Revisited: The Criminalization of Immigration as a Pacification Strategy | 2014 | 30 |
| 6 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 5 |
About Meghan Sacks
Meghan Sacks is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Gender Studies, having authored 10 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (9 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (1 paper) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (120 citations), Sociology and Political Science (226 citations), Gender Studies (33 citations), Law (25 citations) and Health (18 citations). Meghan Sacks has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Alissa R. Ackerman, Vincenzo A. Sainato, David F. Greenberg, Rich Furman, Roger Koppl and Lila Kazemian. Their work appears in journals such as Justice Quarterly, American Journal of Criminal Justice, Criminal Justice Studies, Punishment & Society and Journal of Criminal Justice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.