Criminal Justice Studies

497 papers and 4.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 497 papers published in Criminal Justice Studies in the last decades have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Criminal Justice Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (402 papers), Clinical Psychology (176 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (95 papers) specifically the topics of Crime Patterns and Interventions (242 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (204 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (103 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Criminal Justice Studies are Eric G. Lambert, Richard G. Zevitz, Greg Warchol, Jill S. Levenson, George E. Higgins, Kristen M. Zgoba, Matt DeLisi, Thomas J. Holt, Richard Tewksbury and Nancy L. Hogan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Criminal Justice Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Criminal Justice Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Criminal Justice Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Criminal Justice Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Criminal Justice Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Criminal Justice Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Criminal Justice Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025