Lovingly Quitania Park

500 total citations
6 papers, 348 citations indexed

About

Lovingly Quitania Park is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lovingly Quitania Park has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 348 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 2 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology. Recurrent topics in Lovingly Quitania Park's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). Lovingly Quitania Park is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). Lovingly Quitania Park collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Lovingly Quitania Park's co-authors include Danielle Harvey, Sarah Tomaszewski Farias, Bruce Reed, Dan Mungas, Laurel Beckett, Charles DeCarli, Christa Simon, Owen Carmichael, Keith F. Widaman and Judy Pa and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychology and Aging, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society and The Clinical Neuropsychologist.

In The Last Decade

Lovingly Quitania Park

6 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Lovingly Quitania Park United States	6	252	99	59	57	56	6	348
Megan Lenehan Australia	4	213 0.8×	97 1.0×	42 0.7×	82 1.4×	37 0.7×	5	359
Shannon Z. Klekociuk Australia	10	216 0.9×	103 1.0×	49 0.8×	58 1.0×	28 0.5×	24	349
Katherine G. Denny United States	8	177 0.7×	55 0.6×	38 0.6×	56 1.0×	32 0.6×	12	350
Paul Brewster Canada	10	185 0.7×	71 0.7×	38 0.6×	61 1.1×	85 1.5×	20	405
Katya Numbers Australia	10	164 0.7×	69 0.7×	27 0.5×	57 1.0×	43 0.8×	40	412
Robert Sigström Sweden	13	190 0.8×	43 0.4×	49 0.8×	97 1.7×	91 1.6×	40	478
Jochen Werle Germany	7	130 0.5×	55 0.6×	62 1.1×	31 0.5×	56 1.0×	9	286
Carol Opdebeeck United Kingdom	10	303 1.2×	136 1.4×	35 0.6×	99 1.7×	102 1.8×	19	554
Justina F. Avila United States	10	166 0.7×	63 0.6×	25 0.4×	34 0.6×	75 1.3×	23	300
Martine Mol Netherlands	6	240 1.0×	75 0.8×	30 0.5×	101 1.8×	39 0.7×	9	326

Countries citing papers authored by Lovingly Quitania Park

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lovingly Quitania Park's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lovingly Quitania Park with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lovingly Quitania Park more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lovingly Quitania Park

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lovingly Quitania Park. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lovingly Quitania Park. The network helps show where Lovingly Quitania Park may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lovingly Quitania Park

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lovingly Quitania Park. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lovingly Quitania Park based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lovingly Quitania Park. Lovingly Quitania Park is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Park, Lovingly Quitania, et al.. (2014). The Independent Contributions of Cognitive Impairment and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms to Everyday Function in Older Adults. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 28(2). 215–236. 50 indexed citations

2.

Farias, Sarah Tomaszewski, Elizabeth L. Chou, Danielle Harvey, et al.. (2013). Longitudinal trajectories of everyday function by diagnostic status.. Psychology and Aging. 28(4). 1070–1075. 55 indexed citations

3.

Widaman, Keith F., Danielle Harvey, Laurel Beckett, et al.. (2013). Demographic predictors of cognitive change in ethnically diverse older persons.. Psychology and Aging. 28(3). 633–645. 87 indexed citations

4.

Farias, Sarah Tomaszewski, Lovingly Quitania Park, Danielle Harvey, et al.. (2013). Everyday Cognition in Older Adults: Associations with Neuropsychological Performance and Structural Brain Imaging. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 19(4). 430–441. 78 indexed citations

5.

Gross, Alden L., Jennifer J. Manly, Judy Pa, et al.. (2012). Cortical signatures of cognition and their relationship to Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 6(4). 584–598. 20 indexed citations

6.

Park, Lovingly Quitania, Alden L. Gross, Donald G. McLaren, et al.. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis of the ADNI neuropsychological battery. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 6(4). 528–539. 58 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact