Meghan Craig
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Resilience and Mental Health
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
-
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Papers in
-
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research 2
-
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology 1
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 1
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 1
- Co-authors
- Joël Vos (2 shared papers)Mick Cooper (2 shared papers)Pippa Hugo (1 shared paper)Ulrike Schmidt (1 shared paper)Mark Berelowitz (1 shared paper)Sabine Landau (1 shared paper)Jennifer House (1 shared paper)Dasha Nicholls (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (1 paper)Health Technology Assessment (1 paper)International Journal of Eating Disorders (1 paper)Trials (1 paper)Research Portal (King's College London) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Meghan Craig
5 papers receiving 200 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Clinical Psychology 136
- Applied Psychology 21
- Psychiatry and Mental health 37
- Social Psychology 48
- Health 16
Countries citing papers authored by Meghan Craig
This map shows the geographic impact of Meghan Craig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meghan Craig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meghan Craig more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Meghan Craig
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meghan Craig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meghan Craig. The network helps show where Meghan Craig may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meghan Craig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 129 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 58 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 6 | Altered connections on the road to psychopathy | 2008 | 0 |
About Meghan Craig
Meghan Craig is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 6 papers that have together received 223 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (2 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (136 citations), Applied Psychology (21 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (37 citations), Social Psychology (48 citations) and Health (16 citations). Meghan Craig has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joël Vos, Mick Cooper, Pippa Hugo, Ulrike Schmidt, Mark Berelowitz, Sabine Landau, Jennifer House, Dasha Nicholls, Ivan Eisler and Mima Simic. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Health Technology Assessment, International Journal of Eating Disorders, Trials and Research Portal (King's College London).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.