Pippa Hugo
About
In The Last Decade
Pippa Hugo
7 papers receiving 234 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Clinical Psychology 222
- Psychiatry and Mental health 93
- Sociology and Political Science 67
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 37
- Pharmacy 23
Countries citing papers authored by Pippa Hugo
This map shows the geographic impact of Pippa Hugo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pippa Hugo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pippa Hugo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pippa Hugo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pippa Hugo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pippa Hugo. The network helps show where Pippa Hugo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pippa Hugo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pippa Hugo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pippa Hugo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pippa Hugo. Pippa Hugo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 119 | |
| 5 | 57 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | GP referral to an eating disorder service: why the wide variation? | 23 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.