Megan Winsall

21 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers

Megan Winsall
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • General Health Professions 205
  • Applied Psychology 154
  • Sociology and Political Science 99
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 81
  • Clinical Psychology 68
Replace Shaun Liverpool with:
Shaun Liverpool United Kingdom
Maria Teresa Moreira Portugal
Beth K Jaworski United States
Stephanie K. Brewer United States
Stephany Carolan United Kingdom
Micki Washburn United States
Carmen M. Tyler United States
Judith Sabetti Canada
Luis Vivanco Spain
Emine Şenyuva Türkiye
Megan Winsall relative to Shaun Liverpool United Kingdom Shaun Liverpool's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Shaun Liverpool · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Megan Winsall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan Winsall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan Winsall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan Winsall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan Winsall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan Winsall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan Winsall. The network helps show where Megan Winsall may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Megan Winsall

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Megan Winsall. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Megan Winsall based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Megan Winsall. Megan Winsall is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 2
3 6
4 17
5 2
6 5
7
Review of innovative models of aged care
5
8 9
9
Review of international systems of long-term care of older people
33
10
Review of International Systems for Long-Term Care of Older People: Report prepared for the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety: research paper 2
4
11
Review of Innovative Models of Aged Care: Report prepared for the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety
2
12 40
13 4
14 40
15 27
16 14
17 28
18 7
19 107
20 14

About Megan Winsall

Megan Winsall is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and General Health Professions, having authored 21 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (6 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (154 citations), General Health Professions (205 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (23 citations). Megan Winsall has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Gaston Antezana, Niranjan Bidargaddi, Simone Orlowski, Anthony Venning, G. Schrader, Sharon Lawn, Suzanne M Dyer, David Smith, Gabrielle Jones and Deb Rawlings. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Journal of Adolescent Health and The Gerontologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026