G. Schrader

51 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

G. Schrader
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Applied Psychology 142
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 205
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 109
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 94
  • Clinical Psychology 133
Replace Janice L. Hastrup with:
Janice L. Hastrup United States
Bryan W. Heckman United States
Siobhán Howard Ireland
Pasquale Roberge Canada
Monika E. Kolodziej United States
Emily H. Feig United States
Nicole Cockayne Australia
Adenekan Oyefeso United Kingdom
Meredith A. Pung United States
Claudia Sikorski Germany
G. Schrader relative to Janice L. Hastrup United States Janice L. Hastrup's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Janice L. Hastrup · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Schrader

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Schrader's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Schrader with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Schrader more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Schrader

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Schrader. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Schrader. The network helps show where G. Schrader may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Schrader, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Schrader Line = papers co-authored together G. Schrader links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015112
2 200187
3 195568
4 200361
5 199761
6 202056
7 200446
8 201740
9 199538
10 201635
11 200934
12 199032
13 199031
14 201628
15 198327
16 198626
17 198524
18 198123
19 201323
20 201417

About G. Schrader

G. Schrader is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Pharmacology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Health and Mental Health (9 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (3 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (142 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (205 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (109 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (94 citations) and Clinical Psychology (133 citations). G. Schrader has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Niranjan Bidargaddi, Frida Cheok, W. Lorenz, A. Henglein, M Andrew, Robert A. Baker, John Knight, Simone Orlowski, Gaston Antezana and Megan Winsall. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, The Medical Journal of Australia, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Australian Journal of Rural Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact