Megan M. Smith
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jane S. PaulsenJames A. MillsDeborah L. HarringtonJeffrey D. LongLeigh J. BeglingerKaren DuffDavid J. MoserMaurizio Fava
- Topics
- Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (15 papers)Neurological disorders and treatments (10 papers)Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
Megan M. Smith
26 papers receiving 827 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 509
- Neurology 399
- Molecular Biology 242
- Psychiatry and Mental health 160
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 83
Countries citing papers authored by Megan M. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Megan M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan M. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Megan M. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan M. Smith. The network helps show where Megan M. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Megan M. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Megan M. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Megan M. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Megan M. Smith. Megan M. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Safe Harbor: Use of the Reflective Supervisory Relationship to Navigate Trauma, Separation, Loss, and Inequity on Behalf of Babies and Their Families. | 3 |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 80 | |
| 5 | 51 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 40 | |
| 9 | 76 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 129 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 100 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 58 |
About Megan M. Smith
Megan M. Smith is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 844 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (15 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (10 papers) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (509 citations), Neurology (399 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (34 citations). Megan M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jane S. Paulsen, James A. Mills, Deborah L. Harrington, Jeffrey D. Long, Leigh J. Beglinger, Karen Duff, David J. Moser, Maurizio Fava, Jonathan E. Alpert and Douglas R. Langbehn. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Neurology and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.