Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta-review
Countries citing papers authored by Guy M. Goodwin
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Guy M. Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guy M. Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guy M. Goodwin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guy M. Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guy M. Goodwin. The network helps show where Guy M. Goodwin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Guy M. Goodwin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Guy M. Goodwin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Guy M. Goodwin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Guy M. Goodwin. Guy M. Goodwin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Geddes, John, Jennifer Rendell, Merryn Voysey, et al.. (2015). Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity).47 indexed citations
10.
Raust, Aurélie, Claire Daban-Huard, B. Cochet, & Guy M. Goodwin. (2014). 47. Troubles neurocognitifs dans les troubles bipolaires. 347–355.1 indexed citations
11.
Favaron, Elisa, et al.. (2011). NEURAL PROCESSING OF EMOTIONAL INFORMATION IS NEGATIVELY BIASED IN DYSPHORIA. Journal of Psychopharmacology. 25.1 indexed citations
12.
Simon, Julian L., Katie Budge, Sarah Bell, et al.. (2011). Impact of True Colours mood monitoring on mental health service utilisation. Bipolar Disorders. 13. 90–90.2 indexed citations
13.
Goodwin, Guy M.. (2011). What clinical features should determine treatment of Severe Depression. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice. 15. 23–23.1 indexed citations
14.
Goodwin, Guy M.. (2011). The diagnostic issue: an updating. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice. 15. 9–9.1 indexed citations
Portella, Marı́a J., et al.. (2004). Neuroticism as a psychological vulnerability factor for mood disorders. Journal of Psychopharmacology. 18.1 indexed citations
17.
Yatham, Lakshmi N., et al.. (2004). The effects of lithium and lamotrigine in prevention of relapse/recurrence of bipolar I depression. Bipolar Disorders. 6. 28–28.1 indexed citations
18.
Taylor, Matthew, Stuart Carney, John Geddes, & Guy M. Goodwin. (2003). Folate for depressive disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010(1). CD003390–CD003390.67 indexed citations
19.
Harmer, Catherine J., et al.. (2002). Repeated administration of citalopram or reboxetine reduces the perception of negative emotions from facial expression.. Journal of Psychopharmacology. 16. 7807.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.