Alida V. Merlo
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peter J. BenekosBitna KimJoycelyn M. PollockJaeyong ChoiWilliam J. CookNathan E. KruisJay S. AlbaneseMeda Chesney‐Lind
- Topics
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (19 papers)Crime Patterns and Interventions (12 papers)Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSloveniaSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Alida V. Merlo
41 papers receiving 448 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Sociology and Political Science 366
- Clinical Psychology 221
- General Health Professions 85
- Political Science and International Relations 76
- Gender Studies 60
Countries citing papers authored by Alida V. Merlo
This map shows the geographic impact of Alida V. Merlo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alida V. Merlo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alida V. Merlo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alida V. Merlo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alida V. Merlo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alida V. Merlo. The network helps show where Alida V. Merlo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alida V. Merlo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alida V. Merlo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alida V. Merlo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alida V. Merlo. Alida V. Merlo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 60 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | Women, Law, and Social Control | 89 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | AN EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DOGMATISM AND CHOICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE AS A MAJOR AMONG COLLEGE FRESHMEN | 5 |
About Alida V. Merlo
Alida V. Merlo is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 41 papers that have together received 522 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (19 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (12 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (221 citations), Sociology and Political Science (366 citations) and Gender Studies (60 citations). Alida V. Merlo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovenia and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Benekos, Bitna Kim, Joycelyn M. Pollock, Jaeyong Choi, William J. Cook, Nathan E. Kruis, Jay S. Albanese, Meda Chesney‐Lind, William D. Bennett and Yeong-hee Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Justice Quarterly, Trauma Violence & Abuse and Journal of Family Violence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.