M.C. Gnädinger

403 citations
18 papers · 336 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

M.C. Gnädinger

16 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

M.C. Gnädinger
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Ophthalmology 96
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 176
  • Equine 8
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 102
  • Cancer Research 43
Replace Lawrence J. Blacik with:
Lawrence J. Blacik United States
Gysbert‐Botho van Setten Sweden
Wolfgang Philipp Austria
W. Manski United States
David G. Yee United States
Jay Krachmer United States
Caitlin M. Logan United States
Chyong Jy Nien United States
C Katakami Japan
Abirami Santhanam United States
M.C. Gnädinger relative to Lawrence J. Blacik United States Lawrence J. Blacik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lawrence J. Blacik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.C. Gnädinger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.C. Gnädinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.C. Gnädinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.C. Gnädinger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.C. Gnädinger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.C. Gnädinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.C. Gnädinger. The network helps show where M.C. Gnädinger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside M.C. Gnädinger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.C. Gnädinger Line = papers co-authored together M.C. Gnädinger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 196975
2 196954
3 197151
4 196950
5 197325
6 196716
7 196414
8 197210
9 19698
10 19767
11 19716
12 19676
13 19665
14 19763
15
[Role of the epithelium in corneal healing].
19722
16
[On the problem of the effect of ascorbic acid on normal intraocular pressure in local application].
19682
17 19751
18 19721

About M.C. Gnädinger

M.C. Gnädinger is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacology and Dermatology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal Surgery and Treatments (7 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (3 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (2 papers), Connective tissue disorders research (2 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Dupuytren's Contracture and Treatments (2 papers) and Hemophilia Treatment and Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (96 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (176 citations), Equine (8 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (102 citations) and Cancer Research (43 citations). M.C. Gnädinger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Claes H. Dohlman, H. H. Slansky, Motokazu Itoi, M Itoi, M Berman, Peter F. Davison, R. Markstein, Ruth Heimann, Ernst H. Bárány and Felix Grün. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Eye Research, Ophthalmologica, Ophthalmic Research, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact