Max von Schantz
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science
- Food Science top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Insect Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- R. HiltunenK. KahlosJuhani LokkiA. Baerheim SvendsenJ. J. C. SchefferAarre HuhtikangasY. AynehchiMarja Sorsa
- Topics
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (9 papers)Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (4 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- FinlandNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Max von Schantz
28 papers receiving 256 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Molecular Biology 141
- Plant Science 128
- Food Science 74
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 73
- Insect Science 46
Countries citing papers authored by Max von Schantz
This map shows the geographic impact of Max von Schantz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max von Schantz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max von Schantz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Max von Schantz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max von Schantz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max von Schantz. The network helps show where Max von Schantz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Max von Schantz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Max von Schantz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Max von Schantz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Max von Schantz. Max von Schantz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 44 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 41 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the composition and the quantity of volatile oil in Scots pine (Pinus silvestris L.). | 7 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | Chemotaxonomische Untersuchungen in der Gattung Picea | 5 |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Max von Schantz
Max von Schantz is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Biochemistry and Plant Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (9 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (4 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (74 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (73 citations) and Insect Science (46 citations). Max von Schantz has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include R. Hiltunen, K. Kahlos, Juhani Lokki, A. Baerheim Svendsen, J. J. C. Scheffer, Aarre Huhtikangas, Y. Aynehchi, Marja Sorsa, Carl‐Gunnar Swahn and Steinar Husebye. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Phytochemistry and Planta Medica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.