Max Schleser

26 papers receiving 140 citations

Peers

Max Schleser
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Communication 21
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 4
  • Human-Computer Interaction 14
  • Speech and Hearing 15
  • Museology 8
Replace Fernando Canet with:
Fernando Canet Spain
Corinna Peil Austria
Sigit Purnama Indonesia
Eduardo X. Fuentes Abeledo Spain
Azizah Ya’acob Malaysia
Aman Aman Indonesia
María Elizabeth Bianconcini de Almeida Brazil
Michael Jäckel Germany
Pratiwi Retnaningdyah Indonesia
Anna Marie Johnson United States
Max Schleser relative to Fernando Canet Spain Fernando Canet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Fernando Canet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Schleser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Schleser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Schleser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Schleser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Schleser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Schleser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Schleser. The network helps show where Max Schleser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Max Schleser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Schleser Line = papers co-authored together Max Schleser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201428
2 200916
3 201510
4 202110
5 20178
6 20218
7
Pasifika Prediabetes Youth Empowerment Programme: learnings from a youth-led community-based intervention study.
20218
8 20187
9 20206
10 20206
11 20216
12 20186
13 20185
14 20213
15 20223
16
Mobile-mentary: Mobile documentaries in the mediascape
20113
17 20242
18 20231
19 20181
20 20211

About Max Schleser

Max Schleser is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Speech and Hearing, Human-Computer Interaction and Communication, having authored 29 papers that have together received 144 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (9 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (6 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (4 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers), Community Health and Development (3 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (3 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (2 papers) and Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (21 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (4 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (14 citations), Speech and Hearing (15 citations) and Museology (8 citations). Max Schleser has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marsha Berry, Camille Baker, Hilary Davis, Ridvan Firestone, Anna Matheson, Anthony McCosker, Lis Ellison‐Loschmann, Diana Bossio, Blakely Brown and Barry Borman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of sociology, Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Studies in Documentary Film and AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact