Fernando Canet

402 citations
35 papers · 195 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Fernando Canet

26 papers receiving 185 citations

Peers

Fernando Canet
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Communication 42
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 18
  • Human-Computer Interaction 10
  • Media Technology 15
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 2
Replace William Merrin with:
William Merrin United Kingdom
Nafisa Kasem Malaysia
Elizabeth Van Couvering Sweden
Ingela Wadbring Sweden
Stephanie Orme United States
Josè Manuel Pérez Tornero Spain
Kristin Veel Denmark
Violet H. Harada United States
Tara McPherson United States
Cristóbal Suárez Guerrero Spain
Fernando Canet relative to William Merrin United Kingdom William Merrin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
William Merrin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Canet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Canet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Canet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Canet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Canet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Canet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Canet. The network helps show where Fernando Canet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Canet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Canet Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Canet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202261
2 200819
3 201412
4
Narrativa audiovisual: estrategias y recursos
200912
5 201611
6 202010
7 20237
8 20196
9 20196
10 20246
11 20176
12 20226
13
New stages, new narrative forms: The Web 2.0 and audiovisual language
20085
14 20204
15 20223
16 20193
17 20163
18 20183
19 19702
20 20162

About Fernando Canet

Fernando Canet is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Literature and Literary Theory and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 195 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (7 papers), Cinema History and Criticism (7 papers), Media Influence and Health (6 papers), Media and Digital Communication (6 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers), Communication and COVID-19 Impact (4 papers), Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media (4 papers) and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (42 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (18 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (10 citations), Media Technology (15 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (2 citations). Fernando Canet has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Germany and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Marta Pérez Escolar, Sebastían Sánchez Castillo, Gerd Bayer and Lluís Codina. Their work appears in journals such as Communication & Society, Continuum, Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, Communication Research and Historia y Comunicación Social.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact