Max L. Stackhouse

568 citations
45 papers · 201 indexed · h-index 9

Max L. Stackhouse

35 papers receiving 134 citations

Peers

Max L. Stackhouse
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Religious studies 55
  • Sociology and Political Science 127
  • Philosophy 32
  • Health 19
  • Political Science and International Relations 45
Replace Luke Bretherton with:
Luke Bretherton United States
Pink Dandelion United Kingdom
Karol Wojtyła Poland
Dwight N. Hopkins United States
George H. Tavard United States
George Weigel United States
Alice Gallin
Joel A. Carpenter United States
Bruce E. Steiner United States
Robert Schreiter Costa Rica
Max L. Stackhouse relative to Luke Bretherton United States Luke Bretherton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Luke Bretherton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max L. Stackhouse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max L. Stackhouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max L. Stackhouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max L. Stackhouse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max L. Stackhouse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max L. Stackhouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max L. Stackhouse. The network helps show where Max L. Stackhouse may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Max L. Stackhouse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max L. Stackhouse Line = papers co-authored together Max L. Stackhouse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20103
2
Christ and the dominions of civilization
20091
3 20091
4 20076
5
Globalization and Grace
20077
6 200413
7 20042
8 20014
9
Religion and the powers of the common life
20000
10
God and Globalization: Religion and the Powers of the Common Life
20009
11 199710
12 19962
13 199131
14 19881
15 19873
16 198610
17
The Religious Situation in the German Democratic Republic
19810
18 19780
19 19774
20 19691

About Max L. Stackhouse

Max L. Stackhouse is a scholar working on Religious studies, History and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 45 papers that have together received 201 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Christian Theology and Mission (13 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (13 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (11 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (2 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (2 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (2 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (55 citations), Sociology and Political Science (127 citations) and Philosophy (32 citations). Max L. Stackhouse has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Adrian Furnham, Robin W. Lovin, William R. Garrett, Frank E. Reynolds, Justo L. González, Don Browning, Donald W. Shriver, James Luther Adams, William T. McKinney and William R. Hutchison. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Review of Religious Research, Religion and American Culture A Journal of Interpretation, Journal of Law and Religion and Theology Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026