Pink Dandelion

590 citations
33 papers · 175 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Pink Dandelion

25 papers receiving 132 citations

Peers

Pink Dandelion
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Religious studies 65
  • Health 37
  • Demography 28
  • Sociology and Political Science 100
  • Anthropology 21
Replace Peter C. Phan with:
Peter C. Phan United States
Paul D. Numrich United States
Peter Schreiner Germany
F.J.S. Wijsen Netherlands
Leland Ryken United States
Enzo Pace Italy
Gabriel Moran United States
John R. Hinnells United Kingdom
Kim Knibbe Brazil
Julia Martí‰nez-Ariño Netherlands
Pink Dandelion relative to Peter C. Phan United States Peter C. Phan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Peter C. Phan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pink Dandelion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pink Dandelion's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pink Dandelion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pink Dandelion more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pink Dandelion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pink Dandelion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pink Dandelion. The network helps show where Pink Dandelion may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Pink Dandelion, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pink Dandelion Line = papers co-authored together Pink Dandelion links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199826
2
Religion and Youth
201022
3
An Introduction to Quakerism
200718
4 200816
5 199416
6 200812
7 200411
8 200210
9 20155
10 20094
11
The Quaker Condition: The Sociology of a Liberal Religion
20084
12 20144
13
British Quakers and a new Kind of End-time Prophecy
20053
14
The British Quaker Survey 2013
20143
15 20173
16
Schism as Collective Disaffiliation: A Quaker Typology
20032
17 20092
18
The Cultivation of Conformity: Towards a General Theory of Internal Secularisation
20192
19
Towards Tragedy/Reclaiming Hope: Literature, Theology and Sociology in Conversation
20042
20
Three Kinds of British Friends: A Latent Class Analysis
20081

About Pink Dandelion

Pink Dandelion is a scholar working on Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science, Health, Political Science and International Relations and Philosophy, having authored 33 papers that have together received 175 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (20 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (11 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (8 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (2 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (1 paper) and Marriage and Sexual Relationships (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (65 citations), Health (37 citations), Demography (28 citations), Sociology and Political Science (100 citations) and Anthropology (21 citations). Pink Dandelion has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Collins, Charles E. Stroud, Roger Homan, Mark Cary, Rachel Muers, Hilary Hinds, Michael Birkel, Bjørn Torgrim Ramberg, W. Caleb McDaniel and Jeffrey Perl. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Contemporary Religion, Common Knowledge, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Social Compass and International Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact