Liat Kriegel

403 citations
25 papers · 270 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Liat Kriegel

22 papers receiving 253 citations

Peers

Liat Kriegel
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • General Health Professions 139
  • Clinical Psychology 109
  • Social Psychology 72
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 49
  • Health 25
Replace Mark Costa with:
Mark Costa United States
Lene Lauge Berring Denmark
Steve Trenoweth United Kingdom
Mary Bartram Canada
Sebastian Gabrielsson Sweden
Max Zubatsky United States
Heikki Ellilä Finland
Laura Rabbi Italy
Kathleen A. Moore United States
Sarah Darghouth United States
Liat Kriegel relative to Mark Costa United States Mark Costa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Mark Costa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liat Kriegel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liat Kriegel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liat Kriegel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liat Kriegel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liat Kriegel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liat Kriegel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liat Kriegel. The network helps show where Liat Kriegel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liat Kriegel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liat Kriegel Line = papers co-authored together Liat Kriegel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201255
2 201939
3 201426
4 201721
5 201817
6 201714
7 202013
8 201910
9 201510
10 202010
11 20219
12 20179
13 20158
14 20215
15 20185
16 20194
17 20234
18 20154
19 20222
20 20212

About Liat Kriegel

Liat Kriegel is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homelessness and Social Issues (10 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (7 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (4 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (139 citations), Clinical Psychology (109 citations), Social Psychology (72 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (49 citations) and Health (25 citations). Liat Kriegel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Lisa Davis, Anthony Fulginiti, John S. Brekke, Oladunni Oluwoye, Karl C. Alcover, Michael G. McDonell, Rohini Pahwa, Sterling McPherson, John M. Roll and Jeffrey Draine. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Community Mental Health Journal, Health & Place, BMJ Open and Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact