Matthew Levering
- Philosophy top 2%
- Religious studies top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Topics
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology (23 papers)Biblical Studies and Interpretation (16 papers)Theology and Philosophy of Evil (9 papers)
- Cited by
- Religious studiesPhilosophyClassics
- Journals
- American Catholic Philosophical QuarterlyModern TheologyThe Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Matthew Levering
45 papers receiving 132 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Philosophy 124
- Religious studies 75
- Sociology and Political Science 69
- History 35
- Political Science and International Relations 29
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Levering
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Levering's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Levering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Levering more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Levering
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Levering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Levering. The network helps show where Matthew Levering may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew Levering
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew Levering. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew Levering based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew Levering. Matthew Levering is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?: Historical and Theological Reflections | 2 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Reading John with St. Thomas Aquinas: Theological Exegesis and Speculative Theology | 4 |
| 7 | Jesus and the Demise of Death: Resurrection, Afterlife, and the Fate of the Christian | 3 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Predestination: Biblical and Theological Paths | 4 |
| 10 | Ressourcement Thomism : sacred doctrine, the Sacraments, and the moral life : essays in honor of Romanus Cessario, O.P. | 2 |
| 11 | Commentary on the Gospel of John | 16 |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | Aquinas the Augustinian | 7 |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | Sacrifice and Community: Jewish Offering and Christian Eucharist | 11 |
| 17 | On Christian dying : classic and contemporary texts | 1 |
| 18 | Juridical language in soteriology: Aquinas's approach | 2 |
| 19 | Knowing the love of Christ | 1 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Matthew Levering
Matthew Levering is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy and Classics, having authored 60 papers that have together received 221 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Philosophy and Theology (23 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (16 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (75 citations), Philosophy (124 citations) and Classics (21 citations). Matthew Levering has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anver M. Emon, David Novák, James A. Weisheipl and Aquinas Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, Modern Theology and The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.