Anver M. Emon
Impact in
-
- Islamic Studies and History
- American Constitutional Law and Politics
- Religious studies top 5%
Papers in
- Accounting 11
- Islamic Finance and Banking Studies 11
-
- Islamic Studies and History 15
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 3
- International Law and Human Rights 2
Anver M. Emon
22 papers receiving 160 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Political Science and International Relations 127
- Religious studies 18
- Sociology and Political Science 126
- Law 26
- Philosophy 28
Countries citing papers authored by Anver M. Emon
This map shows the geographic impact of Anver M. Emon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anver M. Emon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anver M. Emon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anver M. Emon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anver M. Emon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anver M. Emon. The network helps show where Anver M. Emon may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Anver M. Emon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Canada v. Asad Ansari: Avatars, Inexpertise, and Racial Bias in Canadian Anti-Terrorism Litigation | 2020 | 1 |
| 2 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 4 | Natural Law: A Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Trialogue | 2014 | 6 |
| 5 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 6 | Islamic law and international human rights law : searching for common ground? | 2012 | 7 |
| 7 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 29 | |
| 9 | Religious Pluralism and Islamic Law: Dhimmis and Others in the Empire of Law | 2012 | 21 |
| 10 | Reflections on the “Constitution of Medina”: an essay on methodology and ideology in Islamic legal history | 2011 | 7 |
| 11 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 34 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 15 | To Most Likely Know the Law: Objectivity, Authority and Interpretation in Islamic Law | 2009 | 4 |
| 16 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 17 | Conceiving Islamic Law in a Pluralist Society: History, Politics and Multicultural Jurisprudence | 2007 | 10 |
| 18 | 2006 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 2 |
About Anver M. Emon
Anver M. Emon is a scholar working on Accounting, Political Science and International Relations, Archeology, Law and Education, having authored 24 papers that have together received 202 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (15 papers), Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (11 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (6 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (5 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), International Law and Human Rights (2 papers) and Evolving Legal Systems and Governance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (127 citations), Religious studies (18 citations), Sociology and Political Science (126 citations), Law (26 citations) and Philosophy (28 citations). Anver M. Emon has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, South Africa and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include David Novák, Matthew Levering, Mark S. Ellis, Audrey Macklin, David Schneiderman and Ellen Lust. Their work appears in journals such as Middle East Law and Governance, Journal of Law and Religion, Studies in Christian Ethics, Modern Theology and Islamic Law and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.