Matt Stichter
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Ellen FridlandTobias KrettenauerAlexiοs ArvanitisMatthew VessRebecca J. BrookerRebecca J. SchlegelJoshua A. HicksJenae M. Neiderhiser
- Topics
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers)Ethics in medical practice (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaMotivation and EmotionReview of General Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Matt Stichter
24 papers receiving 280 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Cognitive Neuroscience 130
- Philosophy 119
- Social Psychology 88
- Sociology and Political Science 48
- General Health Professions 47
Countries citing papers authored by Matt Stichter
This map shows the geographic impact of Matt Stichter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matt Stichter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matt Stichter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matt Stichter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matt Stichter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matt Stichter. The network helps show where Matt Stichter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matt Stichter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matt Stichter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matt Stichter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matt Stichter. Matt Stichter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | Philosophical and Psychological Accounts of Expertise and Experts | 11 |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 26 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 54 |
About Matt Stichter
Matt Stichter is a scholar working on Philosophy, Applied Psychology and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (119 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (12 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (130 citations). Matt Stichter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ellen Fridland, Tobias Krettenauer, Alexiοs Arvanitis, Matthew Vess, Rebecca J. Brooker, Rebecca J. Schlegel, Joshua A. Hicks and Jenae M. Neiderhiser. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Motivation and Emotion and Review of General Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.