Mateja Peter

511 citations
14 papers · 161 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Mateja Peter

12 papers receiving 153 citations

Peers

Mateja Peter
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Development 35
  • Political Science and International Relations 104
  • Sociology and Political Science 139
  • Gender Studies 16
  • General Social Sciences 3
Replace Dipali Mukhopadhyay with:
Dipali Mukhopadhyay United States
Florian Weigand United Kingdom
Emily Paddon Rhoads United States
Nicholas R. Micinski United States
Benedetta Berti Israel
Dawn Walsh Ireland
Romain Malejacq Netherlands
Rosa Freedman United Kingdom
Sadako Ogata Switzerland
Sebastian von Einsiedel Canada
Mateja Peter relative to Dipali Mukhopadhyay United States Dipali Mukhopadhyay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Dipali Mukhopadhyay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mateja Peter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mateja Peter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mateja Peter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mateja Peter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mateja Peter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mateja Peter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mateja Peter. The network helps show where Mateja Peter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Mateja Peter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mateja Peter Line = papers co-authored together Mateja Peter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201832
2 201631
3 201529
4 202127
5 201324
6 20194
7
Measuring the Success of Peace Operations: Directions in Academic Literature
20164
8 20233
9
The EU and international actors in Kosovo: Competing institutional logics, constructive ambiguity and competing priorities
20182
10 20112
11
Emerging powers and peace operations: An agenda for research
20142
12
The EU's Crisis Management in the Kosovo-Serbia crises
20171
13 20240
14 20250

About Mateja Peter

Mateja Peter is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Infectious Diseases, Development and Philosophy, having authored 14 papers that have together received 161 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Peace and Security Dynamics (11 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (10 papers), Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (3 papers), International Law and Human Rights (2 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (2 papers), Global Security and Public Health (2 papers), Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (1 paper) and Peace and Human Rights Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (35 citations), Political Science and International Relations (104 citations), Sociology and Political Science (139 citations), Gender Studies (16 citations) and General Social Sciences (3 citations). Mateja Peter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Francesco Strazzari, Cedric de Coning and Jozef Bátora. Their work appears in journals such as International Peacekeeping, Global Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, Politics and Governance, Contemporary Security Policy and Third World Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact