Emily Paddon Rhoads

548 total citations
11 papers, 158 citations indexed

About

Emily Paddon Rhoads is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Development. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Paddon Rhoads has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 158 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 2 papers in Development. Recurrent topics in Emily Paddon Rhoads's work include Peacebuilding and International Security (7 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (7 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (2 papers). Emily Paddon Rhoads is often cited by papers focused on Peacebuilding and International Security (7 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (7 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (2 papers). Emily Paddon Rhoads collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Emily Paddon Rhoads's co-authors include Jennifer M. Welsh, Sarah von Billerbeck and Oliver Kaplan and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Affairs and Perspectives on Politics.

In The Last Decade

Emily Paddon Rhoads

7 papers receiving 145 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emily Paddon Rhoads United States	5	140	124	43	15	11	11	158
Sara Hellmüller Switzerland	9	169 1.2×	119 1.0×	28 0.7×	15 1.0×	3 0.3×	28	186
Gerd Oberleitner Austria	5	57 0.4×	66 0.5×	8 0.2×	8 0.5×	11 1.0×	11	94
Niels Terpstra Netherlands	6	150 1.1×	100 0.8×	8 0.2×	16 1.1×	13 1.2×	8	167
Sanam Naraghi Anderlini United States	4	75 0.5×	36 0.3×	11 0.3×	47 3.1×	15 1.4×	10	103
Hicham Bou Nassif United States	7	129 0.9×	86 0.7×	11 0.3×	4 0.3×	15 1.4×	11	148
Maung Aung Myoe Japan	9	141 1.0×	209 1.7×	15 0.3×	2 0.1×	4 0.4×	18	222
Merve Erdilmen Canada	6	63 0.5×	53 0.4×	18 0.4×	4 0.3×	2 0.2×	7	107
Louise Arbour United States	5	60 0.4×	82 0.7×	11 0.3×	3 0.2×	21 1.9×	19	111
Etain Tannam Ireland	7	126 0.9×	100 0.8×	5 0.1×	5 0.3×	26 2.4×	28	155
Julie Hare United Kingdom	3	49 0.3×	54 0.4×	9 0.2×	4 0.3×	5 0.5×	8	91

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Paddon Rhoads

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Paddon Rhoads's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Paddon Rhoads with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Paddon Rhoads more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Paddon Rhoads

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Paddon Rhoads. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Paddon Rhoads. The network helps show where Emily Paddon Rhoads may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Paddon Rhoads

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Paddon Rhoads. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Paddon Rhoads based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Paddon Rhoads. Emily Paddon Rhoads is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Rhoads, Emily Paddon, et al.. (2025). The Scope for Agency and the Role of Individuals in UN Peace Operations. International Peacekeeping. 32(2). 161–174.

2.

Welsh, Jennifer M., et al.. (2025). Risky Business: Organizational Challenges in International Support for Civilian Self-Protection. Perspectives on Politics. 1–21.

3.

Kaplan, Oliver & Emily Paddon Rhoads. (2025). Technology for civilian self-protection. International Affairs. 101(3). 1043–1063.

4.

Rhoads, Emily Paddon. (2024). The Future of Protection in UN Peace Operations. Ethics & International Affairs. 38(4). 418–432.

5.

Rhoads, Emily Paddon, et al.. (2022). Empathy in frontline humanitarian negotiations: a relational approach to engagement. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(1). 4 indexed citations

6.

Rhoads, Emily Paddon, et al.. (2020). The (Self) Protection of Civilians in South Sudan: Popular and Community Justice Practices. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations

7.

Rhoads, Emily Paddon, et al.. (2020). The (self) protection of civilians in South Sudan: Popular and community justice practices. African Affairs. 119(476). 370–394. 22 indexed citations

8.

Rhoads, Emily Paddon. (2019). Putting Human Rights up Front: Implications for Impartiality and the Politics of UN Peacekeeping. International Peacekeeping. 26(3). 281–301. 18 indexed citations

9.

Rhoads, Emily Paddon & Jennifer M. Welsh. (2019). Close cousins in protection: the evolution of two norms. International Affairs. 95(3). 597–617. 34 indexed citations

10.

Rhoads, Emily Paddon. (2016). Taking Sides in Peacekeeping. Oxford University Press eBooks. 36 indexed citations

11.

Rhoads, Emily Paddon. (2016). Taking Sides in Peacekeeping: Impartiality and the Future of the United Nations. Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College). 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact