International Peacekeeping

1.1k papers and 9.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in International Peacekeeping in the last decades have received a total of 9.3k indexed citations. Papers published in International Peacekeeping usually cover Sociology and Political Science (872 papers), Political Science and International Relations (762 papers) and Development (206 papers) specifically the topics of Peacebuilding and International Security (745 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (566 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (222 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Peacekeeping are Oliver P. Richmond, David Chandler, Michael Pugh, Kathleen M. Jennings, Astri Suhrke, Jonathan Goodhand, Roger Mac Ginty, John Karlsrud, Helena Carreiras and Roland Paris.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Peacekeeping

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Peacekeeping. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Peacekeeping.

Countries where authors publish in International Peacekeeping

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Peacekeeping. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Peacekeeping with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Peacekeeping more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025