Massimo Ingrassia

570 citations
26 papers · 232 indexed · h-index 10
Topics
Child Development and Digital Technology (7 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers)Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers)
Partner nations
ItalyUnited Kingdom

In The Last Decade

Massimo Ingrassia

26 papers receiving 226 citations

Peers

Massimo Ingrassia
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Clinical Psychology 87
  • Sociology and Political Science 65
  • Education 59
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 48
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 39
Replace Esra Çöp with:
Esra Çöp Türkiye
Sanja Franić Netherlands
Fulvio Tassi Italy
Gonca Gül Çelik Türkiye
Loredana Benedetto Italy
Aaron Kaufman United States
Gustavo Gauer Brazil
Sümeyra Fırat Türkiye
Tanja Vehkakoski Finland
Rocío Lavigne-Cerván Spain
Massimo Ingrassia relative to Esra Çöp Türkiye Esra Çöp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Esra Çöp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Massimo Ingrassia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Massimo Ingrassia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Massimo Ingrassia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Massimo Ingrassia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Massimo Ingrassia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Massimo Ingrassia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Massimo Ingrassia. The network helps show where Massimo Ingrassia may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Massimo Ingrassia

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Massimo Ingrassia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Massimo Ingrassia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Massimo Ingrassia. Massimo Ingrassia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 7
2 2
3 5
4 1
5 4
6 1
7 6
8 18
9 9
10 32
11 29
12 3
13 15
14 17
15 1
16 4
17 13
18 15
19
Couple’s well-being and parenting in the transition to parenthood: what are the gender differences?
2
20 19

About Massimo Ingrassia

Massimo Ingrassia is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 26 papers that have together received 232 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Development and Digital Technology (7 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (87 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (48 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (28 citations). Massimo Ingrassia has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Loredana Benedetto, Antonella Gagliano, Eva Germanò, Mark D. Griffiths, Sebastiano Costa, Nadia Barberis, Rosamaria Siracusano, Giacomo Stella, Marco Lamberti and Maria Pia Calabrò. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026