Massimo Frascarelli

896 citations
13 papers · 678 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Massimo Frascarelli

13 papers receiving 649 citations

Peers

Massimo Frascarelli
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 189
  • Equine 16
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 116
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 75
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 76
Replace S. A. Spector with:
S. A. Spector United States
David Peck United States
R. S. Hikida United States
M. J. N. McDonagh United Kingdom
Marian Williams United States
Laura Smallwood United States
J. J. Perrine United States
Jonathan I. Quinlan United Kingdom
Tom Stevens Netherlands
Chantal Pérot France
Massimo Frascarelli relative to S. A. Spector United States S. A. Spector's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.3×
S. A. Spector · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Massimo Frascarelli

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Massimo Frascarelli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Massimo Frascarelli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Massimo Frascarelli more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Massimo Frascarelli

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Massimo Frascarelli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Massimo Frascarelli. The network helps show where Massimo Frascarelli may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Massimo Frascarelli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Massimo Frascarelli Line = papers co-authored together Massimo Frascarelli links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2015184
2 2006124
3 200796
4 200593
5 200681
6 198823
7 200422
8 200622
9 200720
10 19965
11
Evoked potentials obtained with tendon percussion in hemiplegic patients.
19934
12 20052
13
Apoptosis induced in glioma rat cells cultivated in the presence of a medicinal infusion of green tea.
19972

About Massimo Frascarelli

Massimo Frascarelli is a scholar working on Surgery, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 678 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (2 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders (1 paper), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (1 paper) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (189 citations), Equine (16 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (116 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (75 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (76 citations). Massimo Frascarelli has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Valter Santilli, Angelo Cacchio, Romildo Don, Marco Paoloni, Alberto Ranavolo, Filippo Camerota, Flaminia Frascarelli, Fabio De Santis, Mariano Serrao and Aldina Venerosi. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Biomechanics, Pediatric Blood & Cancer, Journal of Neuroscience, The American Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact