Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Guidelines for Controlled Trials of Drugs in Migraine: Second Edition
Countries citing papers authored by Giorgio Sandrini
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Giorgio Sandrini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giorgio Sandrini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giorgio Sandrini more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Giorgio Sandrini
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giorgio Sandrini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giorgio Sandrini. The network helps show where Giorgio Sandrini may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Giorgio Sandrini
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Giorgio Sandrini.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Giorgio Sandrini based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Giorgio Sandrini. Giorgio Sandrini is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bartolo, Daniela De, Giovanni Morone, Alessio Baricich, et al.. (2019). From paper to informatics: the Post Soft Care-App, an easy-to-use and fast tool to help therapists identify unmet needs in stroke patients.. PubMed. 33(4). 200–205.11 indexed citations
Porro, Carlo Adolfo, Giorgio Sandrini, Andrea Truini, et al.. (2016). Diagnosing and assessing pain in neurorehabilitation: from translational research to the clinical setting. Evidence and recommendations from the Italian Consensus Conference on Pain in Neurorehabilitation.. PubMed. 52(5). 717–729.4 indexed citations
5.
Tamburin, Stefano, Marco Lacerenza, Gianluca Castelnuovo, et al.. (2016). Pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies in the integrated treatment of pain in neurorehabilitation. Evidence and recommendations from the Italian Consensus Conference on Pain in Neurorehabilitation.. PubMed. 52(5). 741–752.12 indexed citations
6.
Brighina, Filippo, Gianluca Coppola, Daniele Marinazzo, et al.. (2014). Altered processing of sensory stimuli in patients with migraine.. Nature reviews. Neuroscience. 10.1 indexed citations
Sandrini, Giorgio, A Cecchini, Enrico Alfonsi, & Giuseppe Nappi. (2001). The effectiveness of nimesulide in pain. A neurophysiological study in humans. Drugs of today. 37. 21–29.7 indexed citations
14.
Sandrini, Giorgio, et al.. (1992). Acute study of tens-induced changes in exteroceptive and proprioceptive reflexes in normals. 7. 159–166.1 indexed citations
Martignoni, E., et al.. (1986). Lisuride in parkinson's disease: naive and long-term treatment. Current Therapeutic Research. 39(5). 696–708.2 indexed citations
Tanzi, Franco, et al.. (1979). Computerized EMG analysis.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 19(6). 495–503.3 indexed citations
20.
Nappi, Giuseppe, F Savoldi, Giorgio Sandrini, & M. Poloni. (1978). Tonographic evaluation of intraocular pressure in myotonic dystrophy.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 54(2). 180–3.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.